<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HD VoIP? Oh, Brother&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother</link>
	<description>Simplifying Network Security, Telecom, Gadgets, and More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:26:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A.T.</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-25720</link>
		<dc:creator>A.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-25720</guid>
		<description>@Phoneboy I do not give up that easy to all cloaked nicety of Skype :D i prefer to know what i run on my machine and where it sends what ;) and i do not see any big difference on &quot;Skype-to-Skype with iSAC on 16kHz&quot; and &quot;SIP-to-SIP on Speex with 16kHz&quot;... should I try differentiate them harder? lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Phoneboy I do not give up that easy to all cloaked nicety of Skype <img src='http://phoneboy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  i prefer to know what i run on my machine and where it sends what <img src='http://phoneboy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  and i do not see any big difference on &#8220;Skype-to-Skype with iSAC on 16kHz&#8221; and &#8220;SIP-to-SIP on Speex with 16kHz&#8221;&#8230; should I try differentiate them harder? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoneBoy</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-25719</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-25719</guid>
		<description>@peter even if the transport is encrypted, a-la Skype, the endpoints themselves are susceptible to being hacked. That&#039;s how most of the Skype &quot;interception&quot; equipment works for the most part.

@A.T. I have a hard time using other VoIP tools because of the quality of Skype. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@peter even if the transport is encrypted, a-la Skype, the endpoints themselves are susceptible to being hacked. That&#8217;s how most of the Skype &#8220;interception&#8221; equipment works for the most part.</p>
<p>@A.T. I have a hard time using other VoIP tools because of the quality of Skype. <img src='http://phoneboy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.T.</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-25718</link>
		<dc:creator>A.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-25718</guid>
		<description>no, high-quality VoIP is not a joke - it is quite feasible, and often available right there... but there are few factors against of it. Firstly, your operator (last mile, be it DSL or cable or even IP-over-avian cheapest carrier) is _not_ interested to give you high quality, it is interested to push as more herrings into... ergh, I mean cheap VoIP calls into available bandwidth. And current battle &quot;Bittorrent-humans vs Comcast-and-all-big-telco-cable-brotherhood&quot; is clearest example - telcos are in business of &quot;yes, we sold you 8mb/sec downstream but you may not use it for full&quot;. Secondly, the other side of coin is purely psychological - once you get used to HD, even slightest distortions will bother you like sharp knife: is this what you are looking for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, high-quality VoIP is not a joke &#8211; it is quite feasible, and often available right there&#8230; but there are few factors against of it. Firstly, your operator (last mile, be it DSL or cable or even IP-over-avian cheapest carrier) is _not_ interested to give you high quality, it is interested to push as more herrings into&#8230; ergh, I mean cheap VoIP calls into available bandwidth. And current battle &#8220;Bittorrent-humans vs Comcast-and-all-big-telco-cable-brotherhood&#8221; is clearest example &#8211; telcos are in business of &#8220;yes, we sold you 8mb/sec downstream but you may not use it for full&#8221;. Secondly, the other side of coin is purely psychological &#8211; once you get used to HD, even slightest distortions will bother you like sharp knife: is this what you are looking for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-25717</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-25717</guid>
		<description>If you want to trial a &quot;HD VoIP&quot; environment (16K, 22K or higher audio for the rest of us) then do give FreeSWITCH a try. It&#039;s an Open Source telephony platform and should release this week their first Release Candidate anticipating their upcoming 1.0 release. Get a server, install Red Hat Enterpise Linux (or it&#039;s free alternative called CentOS) and FreeSWITCH and hook up a couple of Polycom IP430 or IP560 phones. It even does end-to-end encrypted calls too (TLS/SRTP). That&#039;s even safer than Skype with that German company selling Skype interception equipment to their government (like the NSA does not have that...).  Enjoy the real stuff: Open Source &amp; Open Standard HD VoIP. Not that PC bound proprietary Skype crap who&#039;s feature is questionable to say the least. The project lives at http://www.freeswitch.org Support is available in the irc channel #freeswitch on irc.freenode.net or the mailinglist (subscribe at freeswitch.org).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to trial a &#8220;HD VoIP&#8221; environment (16K, 22K or higher audio for the rest of us) then do give FreeSWITCH a try. It&#8217;s an Open Source telephony platform and should release this week their first Release Candidate anticipating their upcoming 1.0 release. Get a server, install Red Hat Enterpise Linux (or it&#8217;s free alternative called CentOS) and FreeSWITCH and hook up a couple of Polycom IP430 or IP560 phones. It even does end-to-end encrypted calls too (TLS/SRTP). That&#8217;s even safer than Skype with that German company selling Skype interception equipment to their government (like the NSA does not have that&#8230;).  Enjoy the real stuff: Open Source &amp; Open Standard HD VoIP. Not that PC bound proprietary Skype crap who&#8217;s feature is questionable to say the least. The project lives at <a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.freeswitch.org</a> Support is available in the irc channel #freeswitch on irc.freenode.net or the mailinglist (subscribe at freeswitch.org).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-23192</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-23192</guid>
		<description>HD VOIP??  LOL, that is a joke!  Do you really think anyone would purchase this?  Unless you have money to spend down the drain.. Come on people, what are high speed internet providers thinking?  http://t1survey.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HD VOIP??  LOL, that is a joke!  Do you really think anyone would purchase this?  Unless you have money to spend down the drain.. Come on people, what are high speed internet providers thinking?  <a href="http://t1survey.com" rel="nofollow">http://t1survey.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth About HD VoIP - VoIP News</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-23156</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth About HD VoIP - VoIP News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-23156</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] down for SkypeOut calls, which must transition to the PSTN using codecs that only capture that 8 KHz of sound. So although you may speak into your computer and Skype may capture 16 KHz of sound, your overall [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://phoneboy.com/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] down for SkypeOut calls, which must transition to the PSTN using codecs that only capture that 8 KHz of sound. So although you may speak into your computer and Skype may capture 16 KHz of sound, your overall [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Brown</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-22330</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-22330</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure part of the talk of HD VoIP comes from the recent articles that appeared in eWeek. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2181656,00.asp

It would seem like until we get the performance and bandwidth issues worked out with good &quot;old-fashioned&quot; VoIP that moving to HD-VoIP doesn&#039;t make sense. The thought that now I&#039;ll be able to hear tele-marketers crystal clear in Hi-Def really doesn&#039;t do a lot for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure part of the talk of HD VoIP comes from the recent articles that appeared in eWeek. <a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2181656,00.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2181656,00.asp</a></p>
<p>It would seem like until we get the performance and bandwidth issues worked out with good &#8220;old-fashioned&#8221; VoIP that moving to HD-VoIP doesn&#8217;t make sense. The thought that now I&#8217;ll be able to hear tele-marketers crystal clear in Hi-Def really doesn&#8217;t do a lot for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Performance Daily</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-22298</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Performance Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-22298</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Network Performance Links: HD VoIP, iPanic, and one man&#039;s four-core trash is another man&#039;s three-core treasure....&lt;/strong&gt;

The Phoneboy Blog: HD VoIP? Oh, Brother… Phoneboy talks about HD VoIP, or VoIP that sounds like it&#039;s coming from a CD Player, not a phone. That&#039;s entirely plausible, but, as he points out, it&#039;s a major increased bandwidth cost......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Network Performance Links: HD VoIP, iPanic, and one man&#8217;s four-core trash is another man&#8217;s three-core treasure&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>The Phoneboy Blog: HD VoIP? Oh, Brother… Phoneboy talks about HD VoIP, or VoIP that sounds like it&#8217;s coming from a CD Player, not a phone. That&#8217;s entirely plausible, but, as he points out, it&#8217;s a major increased bandwidth cost&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-7600</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-7600</guid>
		<description>I had no clue HD VoIP was even around. Apprently it&#039;s so limited that I&#039;m not suprised I havent.

http://nationwideLD.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no clue HD VoIP was even around. Apprently it&#8217;s so limited that I&#8217;m not suprised I havent.</p>
<p><a href="http://nationwideLD.com" rel="nofollow">http://nationwideLD.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark R. Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-4166</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark R. Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 04:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-4166</guid>
		<description>PolyCom is starting to advertise better-quality codecs built into their hard phones. They sound nice, talking to one another; but I wonder if the tiny marginal difference in a 16-bit codec is going to matter to anyone.

Of course, PolyCom&#039;s are big sellers among VoIP service providers lately. And carrier-to-carrier VoIP peering is moving along, slowly. Maybe some day the nicer codecs will matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PolyCom is starting to advertise better-quality codecs built into their hard phones. They sound nice, talking to one another; but I wonder if the tiny marginal difference in a 16-bit codec is going to matter to anyone.</p>
<p>Of course, PolyCom&#8217;s are big sellers among VoIP service providers lately. And carrier-to-carrier VoIP peering is moving along, slowly. Maybe some day the nicer codecs will matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoneBoy</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-3490</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-3490</guid>
		<description>Podcasters mostly use Skype for this very reason, John. Non-podcasting consumers are, on the whole, not likely to care. Of course, there are some that are extra sensitive to the use of codecs (some hate G729, for instance).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Podcasters mostly use Skype for this very reason, John. Non-podcasting consumers are, on the whole, not likely to care. Of course, there are some that are extra sensitive to the use of codecs (some hate G729, for instance).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Federico</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>John Federico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>Consumers may not care, but podcasters care a LOT since many of them record their podcasts using VOIP services like Skype and Gizmo Project.

Regards,

-jf.

-- 
John Federico

http://www.newrules.com

http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnfederico

http://johnfederico.brandbrains.net

http://www.odmcast.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumers may not care, but podcasters care a LOT since many of them record their podcasts using VOIP services like Skype and Gizmo Project.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>-jf.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
John Federico</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newrules.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.newrules.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnfederico" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnfederico</a></p>
<p><a href="http://johnfederico.brandbrains.net" rel="nofollow">http://johnfederico.brandbrains.net</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.odmcast.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.odmcast.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HD VoIP? -- Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-3469</link>
		<dc:creator>HD VoIP? -- Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-3469</guid>
		<description>[...] asks what HD VoIP is, and PhoneBoy responds that it probably doesn&#8217;t mean much.  Wideband CODECS have been around for ages, but because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] asks what HD VoIP is, and PhoneBoy responds that it probably doesn&#8217;t mean much.  Wideband CODECS have been around for ages, but because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP, Web 2.0 and a lot of Tech News » LucaFiligheddu.com</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-19979</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP, Web 2.0 and a lot of Tech News » LucaFiligheddu.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-19979</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; A few days ago this post caught my attention. It&#039;s about Iristel offering HD VoIP to their users.  Today TheVoIPGirl posted some comments and Phoneboy replicated with his take.  The first thought has been: great marketing move. Yes, because they&#039;re using &quot;HD&quot; applied to voice. &quot;HD&quot; is an acronym widely used because tons of new HD TVs are hitting the market during these months. Retailers show these two letters&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a> A few days ago this post caught my attention. It&#8217;s about Iristel offering HD VoIP to their users.  Today TheVoIPGirl posted some comments and Phoneboy replicated with his take.  The first thought has been: great marketing move. Yes, because they&#8217;re using &#8220;HD&#8221; applied to voice. &#8220;HD&#8221; is an acronym widely used because tons of new HD TVs are hitting the market during these months. Retailers show these two letters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techmeme</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/1321/hd-voip-oh-brother/comment-page-1#comment-19980</link>
		<dc:creator>Techmeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/node/1321#comment-19980</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Discussion: The PhoneBoy Blog and Thoughts on VoIP, technology  &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a> Discussion: The PhoneBoy Blog and Thoughts on VoIP, technology  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
