<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Google As A Spell Checker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker</link>
	<description>Simplifying Network Security, Telecom, Gadgets, and More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:49:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gfanatic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Teaches Spelling</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker/comment-page-1#comment-26349</link>
		<dc:creator>Gfanatic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Teaches Spelling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 05:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker#comment-26349</guid>
		<description>[...] Google search has a spell checker which offers alternative spelling for queries. Google doesn&#8217;t say you misspelled the word but it will ask you: &#8220;Did you mean: (a more common spelling)?&#8221; Even though there are people who find the spell checker feature helpful, some are unsatisfied. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google search has a spell checker which offers alternative spelling for queries. Google doesn&#8217;t say you misspelled the word but it will ask you: &#8220;Did you mean: (a more common spelling)?&#8221; Even though there are people who find the spell checker feature helpful, some are unsatisfied. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jollyroger</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker/comment-page-1#comment-25964</link>
		<dc:creator>jollyroger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker#comment-25964</guid>
		<description>HOW DO YOU DO... LANGUAGE


I gave my spell checker the authority of a judge, feeling I have to argue my case at every fragment and semi colon bad usage. But personally my spell checkerâ��s seriously disabled. For one, itâ��s an American and thus frequently masturbates over the letter z. Two, it loves to connect and split words when I like them the way they are. After I disagree with itâ��s correction and we move on, it not only highlights that expression not been in itâ��s Delaware Dictionary It goes back to it believing that Iâ��ve collected my senses realised my misguided misgivings offering me the same standardization. This twatâ��s seriously deluded. Itâ��s got no qualifications and it doesnâ��t even speak!

And while weâ��re here. Why do we hang onto odd things like Times New Roman. Romans didnâ��t even have Times New Roman cos it was invented in 1933. So why do we have to keep using it, itâ��s cottage cheese.

... more at lifestyleguides.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOW DO YOU DO&#8230; LANGUAGE</p>
<p>I gave my spell checker the authority of a judge, feeling I have to argue my case at every fragment and semi colon bad usage. But personally my spell checkerâ��s seriously disabled. For one, itâ��s an American and thus frequently masturbates over the letter z. Two, it loves to connect and split words when I like them the way they are. After I disagree with itâ��s correction and we move on, it not only highlights that expression not been in itâ��s Delaware Dictionary It goes back to it believing that Iâ��ve collected my senses realised my misguided misgivings offering me the same standardization. This twatâ��s seriously deluded. Itâ��s got no qualifications and it doesnâ��t even speak!</p>
<p>And while weâ��re here. Why do we hang onto odd things like Times New Roman. Romans didnâ��t even have Times New Roman cos it was invented in 1933. So why do we have to keep using it, itâ��s cottage cheese.</p>
<p>&#8230; more at lifestyleguides.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 中国股票快车 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Teaches Spelling</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker/comment-page-1#comment-25889</link>
		<dc:creator>中国股票快车 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Teaches Spelling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker#comment-25889</guid>
		<description>[...] Google search has a spell checker which offers alternative spelling for queries. Google don&#8217;t say you misspelled the word but it would ask you: &#8220;Did you mean: (a more common spelling)?&#8221; Even though there are people who find the spell checker feature helpful, some are unsatisfied. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google search has a spell checker which offers alternative spelling for queries. Google don&#8217;t say you misspelled the word but it would ask you: &#8220;Did you mean: (a more common spelling)?&#8221; Even though there are people who find the spell checker feature helpful, some are unsatisfied. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exhorborant - Dogpile Web Search</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker/comment-page-1#comment-25759</link>
		<dc:creator>Exhorborant - Dogpile Web Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker#comment-25759</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] ...      www.epm.org/articles/leadpur2.html  [Found on Google, Yahoo! Search, Ask.com]     3.  Using Google As A Spell Checker    It suggested the word exhorborant. When I typed in define:exhorborant, of course, it came up with [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://phoneboy.com/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] &#8230;      <a href="http://www.epm.org/articles/leadpur2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.epm.org/articles/leadpur2.html</a>  [Found on Google, Yahoo! Search, Ask.com]     3.  Using Google As A Spell Checker    It suggested the word exhorborant. When I typed in define:exhorborant, of course, it came up with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://www.goebel.net</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker/comment-page-1#comment-25489</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.goebel.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2057/using-google-as-a-spell-checker#comment-25489</guid>
		<description>Next time you better don&#039;t use Google but Merriam-Webster online (http://www.m-w.com/). That&#039;s faster. Even better is a Mozilla plugin: http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=Webster&amp;sherlock=yes&amp;opensearch=yes&amp;submitform=Search</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next time you better don&#8217;t use Google but Merriam-Webster online (<a href="http://www.m-w.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.m-w.com/</a>). That&#8217;s faster. Even better is a Mozilla plugin: <a href="http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=Webster&amp;sherlock=yes&amp;opensearch=yes&amp;submitform=Search" rel="nofollow">http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=Webster&amp;sherlock=yes&amp;opensearch=yes&amp;submitform=Search</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
