Comments on: AT&T’s SIM-only Plan Still Requires A Contract?

By: cangel

cangel — Tue, 06 May 2008 13:59:15 +0000

Thank you for the update. I thought you still had to have that long term contract. This gives me another option when my promotional contract runs out.

By: Ricky

Ricky — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:59:03 +0000

historically with Cingular, the ‘promotional element’ on the plan was the unlimited M2M.

By: PhoneBoy

PhoneBoy — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:30:24 +0000

@spg Personally, I think it’s a trick. My personal experience is a 1 year contract with a SIM-only option. Still getting rogered, but not as badly.

By: spg

spg — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:12:38 +0000

sounds to me like a plan for the idiotic. i mean you take a free phone a give it way, sell it at a pawn shop, whatever. it tells a lot about the state of the American consumer that a company would even have the guts to do such a thing. the saddest part is that i am sure people buys these things and just let at&t keep what would have been a free phone.

By: Blog » Blog Archive » AT&T’s SIM-only Plan Still Requires A Contract?

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:02:10 +0000

[...] PhoneBoy wrote an interesting post today on AT&Tâ��s SIM-only Plan Still Requires A Contract?Here’s a quick excerptCreative Commons License This work originally came from The PhoneBoy Blog and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Fingerprint: e37ac627f3d973694c212ff9430d215a. [...]