What’s Keeping US Mobile Phones in The Stone Age?

Filed under: mobile network operators - 27 Jul 2007 0:01

Pay Phone There’s an interesting thread going on on Slashdot right now about why mobile phones suck ass in the US. Lots of interesting ideas being spouted off. I can sum up the problem in two words: the carriers. I can also sum up the solution in two words: Carterfone rules.

The mobile carriers are the gatekeepers to the network. They sell both the service and the devices needed to make use of that service. They make it impossible to buy a phone without getting a service contract. And if you buy your phone somewhere else, you may still have to do a service contract. Of course, if you’re with Sprint, Verizon, or some other CDMA carrier, you can’t even use a phone you didn’t buy from the carrier!

And now the solution: Carterfone rules. The Carterfone rules are the reason you can go buy any old phone you want to plug into your landline at home. Before those rules took effect in 1968–and even for several years after–you had to lease your phone from Ma Bell. You were not allowed to hook up any device to the telephone network. Things like answering machines and cordless phones–kind of what the Carterfone device was, ironically–were simply not allowed by Ma Bell. Sound familiar to the state of the mobile phone industry in the US? It should.

While a lot of people talk about adding additional regulation and the like, I think what we need to do is bring the same rules that apply to just about every other aspect of our connectivity and require that the mobile carriers adhere to the Carterfone rules. Oh sure, carriers can still sell their locked, crippled, buggy device for a song to those that want it. But the rest of us can buy phones we want. And when we’re done with the carrier? We can take it with us to the next carrier–assuming they use the same technology.

Think I’m right or wrong? Let me know by leaving a comment.

Bookmark with: del.icio.us Digg it Furl iFeedReaders ma.gnolia Maple.nu RawSugar reddit Simpy StumbleUpon

Comments (5)

5 Comments

Pingback by EQO Community | Blogs and Forums

and this report is proof in the pudding. The Phoneboy wrote an excellent response that all on the verge of brainwashing should read to dispel the real myths of the American Wireless industry. One point I particularly agree with him on is the quality and availability of the average American handset. When phone shopping from Europe carriers, I’ve noticed that there are a plethora of high end choices at relatively low prices. American’s are not exposed to the range of handsets they deserve, particularly those with CDMA carriers.
Pingback by The PhoneBoy Blog

When I was looking for some information on Carterfone rules, I ran across this PDF from the CTIA about how the Carterfone rules should not apply to the wireless industry.I tend to disagree. Let me pick apart their talking points: Requiring wireless networks to support any, generic device would erode the levels of service quality that wireless consumers have come to expect and demand.
Pingback by The PhoneBoy Blog

. While I certainly applaud that as a consumer (not speaking for Nokia), I would like it even more if they applied these principles to the existing wireless spectrum. It’s called the Carterfone rules, asI’ve written about before. It would be nice if I could figure out the right person(s) to discuss this with in Nokia. Believe me, I bring it up every chance it’s appropriate. Clearly this press release, which I will include after the jump, indicates that
Comment by Markus Goebel

Poor Americans! You describe exactly what we have in Germany. I switch, sell, buy and swap cell phones regularily whithout problems. There are locked devices, but I never had one.
Comment by ScottRD

I know we’ve discussed this before, but for the sake of posterity I’ll put it in writing. I couldn’t agree with you more. I still say a majority of the reason we are still in this situation is lack of knowledge on the part of the North American consumer, beyond those of us in the “biz” or some of those in the “prosumer” category.
I’m wondering who has an idea about the best way to edumicate the general populace on the disgusting stranglehold the carriers have on all of us who use mobile phones in North America? I’m still struggling with this question.
Pingback by Nokia Applauds FCC Decision To Require Open Access in 700MHz Spectrum

[...] It’s nice to see my employer is happy with the recent decision by the FCC to require companies that purchase spectrum in the upcoming 700MHz actions to actually permit any compatible device to connect. While I certainly applaud that as a consumer (not speaking for Nokia), I would like it even more if they applied these principles to the existing wireless spectrum. It’s called the Carterfone rules, as I’ve written about before. [...]
Pingback by CTIA’s “Talking Points” Against Carterfone Rules

[...] this PDF from the CTIA about how the Carterfone rules should not apply to the wireless industry. I tend to disagree. Let me pick apart their talking [...]